Is Asia primed for increased rivalry or greater co-operation Term Paper

Is Asia primed for increased competitor or greater co-operation - margin Paper ExampleThese include the North Korean Taepodong missiles and nuclear research crises, the impact of the financial crisis on Asian countries and subsequent socio-economic turmoil, and conflict over the Taiwan Straits (Welch & Milne, 2014 p67). However, although the Asian region is a highly unstable one, the reasons for this rivalry are not entirely tied to these events as several scholars have claimed. plot of land Friedbergs argument contends that Asia cannot move towards cooperation due to its multi-polar geopolitics, the United States strategic interests in the region provide a stabilising power balance. In addition, the dearth of democratic and strong regional institutions, which is also part of his argument, would take care to contradict evidence showing the opposite as Indo-Sino cooperation is increasing (Alagappa, 2011 p157). In fact, regional actors pose the largest menace to stability and incre ased cooperation in Asia. The extremely different and isolationist values and beliefs professed by these actors make sovereignty contests in Taiwan and Korean waters a capableness cause of military rivalry and conflict. These potential but intangible causes of rivalry and conflict should be given the closest attention. Moreover, the role played by the US in Asia cannot be ignored as its strategic military strength and alliances make it the prevailing power (Alagappa, 2011 p159). This paper will aim to use three theoretical paradigms of international relations the realist, liberal, and constructivist approaches, in examining the regional environment in Asia and forming a more considerate and accurate assessment of prospects for increased rivalry or cooperation in Asia.The liberal, realist, and constructivist approaches to IR offer different perspectives of what governs the behaviour of state actors, especially in the procession of stability and cooperation or rivalry and conflict (Lanyi & McWilliams, 2013 p90). The realist school of IR thought considers power to be the briny